Urgent civil protection may be needed where a final judgment would come too late. Interim injunctions and attachment serve different purposes and require a suitable claim, urgency or other statutory grounds, and adequate supporting evidence. We assess both applications and responses to threatened or granted measures.
What we assess
The proposed order should be precise and enforceable. Delay, incomplete evidence or an overly broad request can undermine the application. The implications of a provisional measure, including possible liability if it proves unjustified, belong in the decision alongside the immediate commercial objective.
Four practical examples
Illustrative scenarios, not accounts of client matters. The appropriate response depends on the documents, applicable law and procedural position.
A threatened disclosure
A former partner is about to disclose confidential technical information. The rights basis, protective measures and immediate risk are examined. Evidence of the threatened disclosure is needed; general concern alone may not support urgent relief.
Assets may be dissipated
A creditor fears that enforcement will be frustrated. The debt and specific grounds for attachment are assessed separately. Non-payment by itself does not establish every condition for freezing assets.
An injunction without prior hearing
A company receives an order affecting sales. Its exact scope, service and response options are checked immediately. Compliance and a possible challenge must be coordinated to avoid additional enforcement consequences.
Trade-fair urgency
A product presentation creates a short decision window. Rights, evidence, venue and available protective steps are organised before the event where possible. A rushed application cannot compensate for missing proof of the underlying claim.
Documents that help
Contracts and rights documents, dated evidence of the threatened conduct, correspondence, proof of urgency and any existing order.
From assessment to the next step
We first distinguish established facts from disputed allegations and identify any step needed to preserve rights. The legal route is then assessed against the commercial objective, available evidence and potential cost. Where technical or foreign-law input is required, responsibilities are coordinated before further work is commissioned. Negotiation, formal proceedings and practical implementation are considered together; a favourable legal position still needs a workable route to the intended result.
Explore all practice areas · Process and fees
Discuss your matter
Tell us the parties involved, your objective and any deadlines. Our main office is in Hanover, Lower Saxony. We advise on German-law matters nationwide and coordinate cross-border work with locally qualified counsel where required.
Send an enquiry — all fields optional · +49 511 3573560
We check conflicts and agree the scope and fees before accepting instructions. An enquiry alone does not create an engagement or preserve a deadline.